Monthly Archives: March 2012

Two accused of shooting another

A brutal crime. A man was a passenger in a car when two others decided to shoot him. Now the police have identified their suspects.
Who would commit such an atrocious act
Oh. Pretty much like almost every other crime. It was criminals.
Don’t worry, the usual suspects will start screaming that we need to repeal “stand your ground” laws any minute.


===================================================

Do you RSS? Don’t know what an RSS Feed is?



Save time and read all the latest blog news first.

Meanwhile in Rebecca Peters Paradise: Club Robbery edition

Two are on trial for an armed robbery in a club in 2008. One has already been sentenced. One just pled guilty and the other, the security guard accused of being the inside man maintains his innocence. For a country with such strict gun control, how could this happen?

It’s almost as if the Australians have only disarmed the law abiding, leaving the criminals free reign.


===================================================

Do you RSS? Don’t know what an RSS Feed is?



Save time and read all the latest blog news first.

Yo Dawg

Can you imagine the embarrassment?

If you stay away from drugs, things like this don’t happen.
Just a tip.

===================================================

Do you RSS? Don’t know what an RSS Feed is?



Save time and read all the latest blog news first.

Robbers gotta rob

This guy didn’t waste any time jumping right back on the horse that threw him.
A felon, huh?
Wow, real nice guy.
He’s been out of jail less than 3 months and he’s already getting caught robbing banks. Who knows what he’s been up to in the intervening time.


===================================================

Do you RSS? Don’t know what an RSS Feed is?



Save time and read all the latest blog news first.

Meanwhile in Rebecca Peters Paradise: They Were Getting Them From WHERE? Edition

Sydney Police have cracked an international gun smuggling ring. They infiltrated and broke up a gang who were illegally smuggling guns into Australia.

 Wait, from GERMANY? You mean that these Australian residents weren’t flying to the US, buying guns without background checks in US gun shows, and then smuggling them into Australia?
It’s almost like the gun grabbers are lying to us.


===================================================

Do you RSS? Don’t know what an RSS Feed is?



Save time and read all the latest blog news first.

Roomate in Trunk

You know, when cops find a dead body in the trunk of a car, they get suspicious.
Why the roommate?
Because murder appears to be about the only crime he hasn’t committed yet.


===================================================

Do you RSS? Don’t know what an RSS Feed is?



Save time and read all the latest blog news first.

Meanwhile in Rebecca Peters Paradise: Drama Llama edition

You just know that this pistol had to have been made by Llama, right?

 I think defacing a firearm show an extreme lack of respect for firearms, and should be a flogging offense. Modify it to work better or look better, sure. Scratching “Any Drama” in the side? 50 lashes.

This is all in a country that turns a simple legal firearms transfer into a months long bureaucratic root canal, and they couldn’t keep guns out of the hands of criminals so stupid that they thought scratching words on the slide was a good idea.
So much for gun control.


===================================================

Do you RSS? Don’t know what an RSS Feed is?



Save time and read all the latest blog news first.

You’re right, but not for the reason you think

NC Policy Watch is a FAR left outfit here in North Carolina. How far left? Close enough to Pol Pot that they could have lunch together, but the ghost of Ted Kennedy would need a telescope to watch them.
NC Policy Watch, in an unprecedented moment of agreement with Civitas, a conservative pro-business organization, thinks we should get rid of the state lottery. Why? You’re going to love this.
You mean that the lottery is teaching citizens that it is a vast leviathan that will take everything they have and crush them like a little bug?
Around here I call that “Truth in Advertising.”


===================================================

Do you RSS? Don’t know what an RSS Feed is?



Save time and read all the latest blog news first.

Why does everyone think Zimmerman wasn’t arrested?

When you read about the Florida shooting, the biggest complaint I keep hearing is that “they didn’t even arrest the shooter.” I would like to know how they get that idea.

The first question is, what is an arrest? According to all the training I have been given, there are three “levels” of police interaction
1.       Casual conversation
2.       Detention
3.       Arrest

Level 1 is easy to understand. Anyone can have a conversation with anyone else. If the person is entirely free to leave, then the police cannot be said to have detained or arrested them. Arrest is also easy to understand. When you are arrested, you are under the complete control of the police. You are not free to go. It’s level 2, detention, that’s complicated. There are a few things that make a stop by police a detention under Terry v. Ohio rather than an arrest. First, it’s a brief stop based upon Reasonably Articulable Suspicion. Second, it must occur in close proximity to where the suspect was found.

Under United States v. Mayen-Munoz, when you handcuff a compliant suspect and remove him from the scene down to the station, even for a brief time of 5 minutes, that constitutes an arrest. Handcuffs are not an absolute signal of arrest, they can be used for officer safety, but when there is no reason to suspect that the suspect is armed and dangerous, handcuffs signal arrest.

Let’s look at what we know about the capture of George Zimmerman.

I’ve cut out a paragraph that isn’t relevant to this discussion, but you can read the whole report here. (PDF)

So what we know is that George Zimmerman was handcuffed and his weapon was taken from him. He was placed in the back of the police car, given first aid, and transported to the interview room of the Sanford Police Department.

How can anyone spin this as not arrested? He was handcuffed. He was transported away from the scene. He was placed in an interview room, and we know from other sources that he was interrogated interviewed.

This hits all the elements for a court to decide, if anyone bothered to ask them, that George Zimmerman was arrested. Now the police might want to call it an investigative detention, or some other polite locution, but the fact remains that George Zimmerman was not free to refuse any of this. He was certainly permitted to exercise his right to remain silent, and was almost likely mirandized. I think that it is very unlikely that they looked at Zimmerman and said “George, if it’s all right with you, we’d like to have a chat with you. You totally don’t have to go with us, it’s your free choice. You just say the word and we’ll be more than happy to take you home without asking you any questions at all.” What makes it even more unlikely is the fact that neither officer’s report says anything at all about it being voluntary. Cops are careful to put things like that in their report. It helps them at trial when the defendant tries to claim he was searched without a warrant when the cops want to call it a consent search.

It seems to me that what really happened is that they arrested him because they had probable cause to do so. He was standing next to a body, with a gun. He admitted to the arresting officer that he, in the words of the police report, “shot the subject.” Note how the words of the second officer’s statement above are “At no time did I question Zimmerman about the incident that had taken place.” This is ass covering. What that does is preserve probable cause for the arrest. If he is told directly by the suspect that it was self defense, and then he questions that suspect, he runs the risk of developing enough information supporting a self defense claim, which triggers the Florida law saying they have to let him go. Plus it’s good procedure not to mess up the Detective’s interview by accidentally feeding the suspect facts. I’ll bet that if you ask, you’ll find that they discourage the patrol cops from playing detective.

It’s what happened in the interview room that changed everything. Zimmerman is reported to have told them that Martin attacked him, climbed on top of him, and pounded Zimmerman’s head into the sidewalk. That coupled with the witness reports, and the physical evidence triggered the Florida self defense law, and the prosecutor told them that they had no probable cause to charge Zimmerman and needed to let him go. But that doesn’t change the fact that by handcuffing and transporting Zimmerman, they arrested him.

The next question is, why does anyone care whether or not Zimmerman was arrested? The prosecutor decided that there was no probable cause to charge him, so they had to release him. Anyone who thinks that a person should be charged with a crime without Probable Cause is advocating for arbitrary arrest and detention. The attitude of “arrest him, charge him, and let a jury decide” is entirely at odds with our system of jurisprudence. As I read the Florida law, the next step is the Grand Jury. If they decide to indict Zimmerman, he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing under Dennis v. State, where a judge will decide, on the preponderance of the evidence, whether or not statutory immunity applies. Unless the State can show by the preponderance of the evidence that Zimmerman’s actions were not self-defense, the charges get dismissed. If that fails, he gets a jury trial where he can raise the claim of self-defense.

I think it is possible that Zimmerman will get indicted. They always say that a good prosecutor can get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich, but unless they have some bombshell evidence, they won’t get past the evidentiary hearing. And if they had bombshell evidence, they would arrest him before the Grand Jury happened.
Update: Here’s more evidence of it being an arrest.
They denied his request for medical attention in order to get him into the interview room for “a few hours.” This says that the “detention” was lengthy, and absolutely against his will.


===================================================

Do you RSS? Don’t know what an RSS Feed is?



Save time and read all the latest blog news first.

Here’s a tip, lottery tickets have serial numbers

If you’re going to steal stuff, don’t steal stuff that can be tracked easily.
He is accused of breaking into a Sheetz gas station and stealing hundreds of dollars of lottery tickets (scratch offs, I assume) and then cashing a winning ticket. They have him on surveillance cam and he still had $350 worth of tickets on him.
He’s been out of jail for a while for someone who made such a habit of crime that he was labeled a habitual felon and jailed for 7 years.
I guess that he really didn’t learn his lesson.


===================================================

Do you RSS? Don’t know what an RSS Feed is?



Save time and read all the latest blog news first.