Now if we could only convince the North Carolina justice system to treat criminals the same way.
The idiot liberals piss me off. First they want to take my guns away because of crime I’m not committing, and then they are pissing and moaning that assholes like this criminal are getting serious time for serious crimes.
Is it wrong of me to hope that they get victimized by the criminals they loose upon society instead of having them prey upon decent human beings?
We know what happens when a vampire gets confronted with a cross, right?
Has anyone ever wondered what it felt like from the cross’s point of view?
I subscribe in my RSS feed to an extreme leftist blog run by professional agitators. Occasionally they say something stupid about guns. Like most professional leftists, the ratio of saying something stupid about guns/saying anything at all about guns = 1.0.
The latest is a quick post where Rob whines that there might be guns at both political conventions (a lie, NC bans that) and that a candidate for State Auditor is having a gun range fundraiser. He calls these two stories “sobering and depressing.” What can you say. He has a delicate constitution.
What’s fun is the screaming in the comments when I told Rob that their efforts to demonize gun owners was obviously not working as NC Concealed Handgun Permits were growing at about 20% per year. Other commenters are acting like vampires being menaced by the Cross. It’s kind of funny. So far there have not been any Markley’s Law violations, but we have had a Ravenswood Law violation. I’m surprised it took as long as it did. The pearl clutching is particularly entertaining.
47 is 8.69% of all officers killed feloniously. 46 is 9.24% of all officers killed with a gun.
Via Kurt Hoffman, we have John Rosenthal trying to tell us that gun rights are racist. That’s a switch, usually we tell people (quite correctly) that the original gun control laws were specifically tailored to take guns away from the people who were the “wrong” color. That’s right, it’s gun control that’s racist, not gun rights.
I’m not going to cause myself a brain hemorrhage by trying to read all of his arguments, and I’m certainly not going to spend all night refuting them all, but I’m going to talk about one that I know pretty well.
So for the math challenged, 41 is 7.65% of all officers killed feloniously. 40 is 8.16% of all officers killed with a gun. At a minimum Rosenthal has overstated his numbers by 100%. In other words, he pulled a number out of his backside and he hopes that you won’t notice.
In addition, as Kurt reminds us, the only State to mandate “smart gun” technology is New Jersey. And New Jersey specifically exempts police officers from those laws, so even if this fantasy tech existed, the cops getting killed with their own guns wouldn’t be using it.
Rosenthal lies about the numbers. He lies about cops using that technology.
If that’s the care he took with simple, easy to verify information, how much care did he take with the rest of his article?
The last two years we’ve been subjected to all kinds of gnashing and wailing about the “War on Cops™” that was taking the lives of our peace officers. We were led to believe that the increase in “right wing extremism” was leading to the deaths of police in blazing gun battles with the brown shirted militia members even though it was pretty clear that the people who shoot cops are almost universally prior criminals, not Tea Partiers.
The Media and the gun hating Left (but I repeat myself) went absolutely nuts in the first couple of months of last year because of a short run of multiple cop shootings which skewed the numbers. But the larger thing that they missed was the fact that cop murders by firearm were only up in the last two years by comparison to three years ago which was a historically low year. If you spend a month eating one meal a day and then the next month you get three meals a day, no one screams that obesity is around the corner because you’re now eating THREE TIMES AS MUCH!!!
So why aren’t we hearing about this ending of the “War on Cops™?” Probably because it doesn’t fit anyone’s agenda. The Media and the anti-gun Left (repeating, I know) can’t use that to ban guns and attempt to drive a wedge between the police and us. The police can’t use it to insist on getting more expensive and powerful equipment. And the politicians can’t use it to pander to whichever group they feel like pandering to that day.
We, as gun owners, don’t really notice it. We aren’t the ones out murdering cops. Anyone who is honest would be able to tell that within minutes of looking at the data. That just means that anyone who is saying something else is lying.
Did you catch that? Prosecutor Jim O’Neill is actually upset that he can’t prosecute people for whom he has no physical or scientific evidence proving their guilt!
Newsflash for O’Neill: Innocent until proven guilty. Remember that?
Apparently not. O’Neill seems to think that if you claim self defense, it’s somehow up to you to prove that you are not actually a murderer. He just wants to sit back and twiddle his thumbs while you mount your self-defense case from your jail cell. Cops mess up the evidence? O’Neill doesn’t care. It’s not him going to jail because you can’t “prove” your innocence. Don’t have enough money for a good lawyer? O’Neill doesn’t care. He’ll take a plea bargain from your overworked Public Defender.
Here’s a clue. If there is no physical or scientific evidence, and no eyewitnesses, refuting the shooter’s story, then he’s innocent.
Maybe O’Neill should take up another line of work if he objects to actually having to prove a suspect’s guilt. If he can’t respect the bedrock principle of Innocent Until Proven Guilty, then maybe he shouldn’t be a lawyer at all, much less a County Prosecutor.
Make sure to leave a comment, or even better, write a letter to the editor. They need some push back against their assumption that anything that makes the prosecutor’s job more difficult is a bad thing.
Inevitably some reporter decided to go down to the gun shop/range and interview gun owners. I have no idea why they think they will get useful information out of people whose only knowledge of the case comes from the very newspapers and TV reports that are grossly misrepresenting what happened, but they come out anyway.
I think that on the whole, these gun owners represented us pretty well, but I’m still angry that the press has printed what has turned out to be a pack of lies about the case and then demands that the average gun owner react as if those lies are truth. I sent the reporter an email.
The cops handcuffed Zimmerman, put him in a police car, and took him to the station for interrogation. They then compared his statement to the physical evidence found at the scene, and to witness statements. They all matched. They all point to Treyvon attacking Zimmerman, taking him to the ground, sitting on top of him and pounding his head into the pavement. This is considered a deadly force attack in any jurisdiction, including North Carolina. It also points out that there was no duty to retreat even in states that demand you attempt to retreat because retreat is impossible when someone is sitting on top of you.
Now most of us would equate being handcuffed and hauled down to the station as an “Arrest.” The police called in “Investigative Detention.” In either case, the popular notion that Zimmerman was patted on the back, handed his gun back, and sent home to rest while the cops swept up the crime scene is certainly false.
The only specific difference I can see between Florida law and NC Law is that it is written in Florida law that if the police can’t find probable cause to dipute your claim of self defense, they can’t arrest you. Even here in North Carolina, absent probable cause the police can’t arrest you. And when the shooter’s statement, the physical evidence, and the witness statements all line up to say that it was a lawful shoot, they shouldn’t arrest you here in NC either.
Thank you for sending this email. It’s good to have this information.
I don’t expect a lengthy answer from him, he has a real job and is off doing it. The fact that he read the email means he has a chance of knowing the facts next time. He also might call and ask for help.
Getting them to call and ask when they don’t know the answer is half the battle.
Let’s start from the premise that doing a drive by on a Waffle House is a dick move. I hope that anyone involved is caught and prosecuted. But I’ve got to have a laugh at the Fayetteville Observer’s choice in graphics
A Webley revolver? Do they really think that the drive by was done by historical arms collectors? Is the suspect a man in a red coat, wearing a white pith helmet whilst speaking in an upper class British accent?
It is a pretty looking gun, for all that it is not really appropriate for the story they are trying to illustrate.
Can we talk here? I mean, who are these idiots? Not the people in the video. Who are the people who think that this is an effective anti-violence effort? Here we have the spectacle of a bunch of associate victims (and one actual victim) whining about how painful their loss is in the vain hope that the people who might cause more will be moved to “Stop, Think, and Let It Go™”
I’ll bet the people who dreamt this crap up are the same people who pissed all over Nancy Reagan’s “Just Say No” campaign. They went on and on about how people couldn’t “Just Say No.” Now these same fools are trying to emotionally manipulate the psychopaths that commit the vast majority of the violent crime. They are so dumb that instead of researching who it is that they are trying to reach, they sat down at a table and asked themselves “If murderers were just like you and me, how would we change their lives in a public service announcement?”
Here’s what I would like to see. I would like to see this video and the idiots who wrote, directed, produced and edited it taken to Central Prison in Raleigh. I want them to show this video to everyone there who was convicted of murder, manslaughter, assault with a deadly weapon, or any other crime of personal violence. Then I want the people involved in this stupid video to be forced to sit there while the inmates told them exactly how idiotic their public service announcement really was. I want a Siskel and Ebert Scared Straight episode.
Maybe then we can stop pretending that criminals are just like you and me. Maybe then these idiots would stop their emotional masturbation and focus on things that might actually work.
You know, if this is a sample of what the Des Moines Register foists upon the people, I think that they should just stick to sponsoring bike rides. The author of this article apparently has a problem with the newly proposed Castle Bill.
Our opponents are being unmasked as lunatics who have not even bothered to read the bill that they are criticizing. In this day and age it’s easy to link directly to the text of any proposed law. You can read the proposed bill, titled “House File 573” at the Iowa Legislature’s site. It would have taken this columnist about 10 minutes to read the law and realize that everything she said was utter horse manure, but instead she allowed her hatred of guns to get the better of her.
In a way I should be happy. If this is the best the opposition can do, we’ve won. On the other hand, there’s something deeply disturbing about people who argue utter garbage in the face of every bit of evidence to the contrary. It angers me to have to put up with people who are convinced that you are stupid enough to believe the things she says. It angers me that people like her are so blinded by their ideology that they can’t face reality.
Go read the whole article and leave your own comment. While you’re there, “like” my comment. It’s a good way to let the Des Moines Register know how you feel about people using their paper to lie so completely about the law.