With the confusion of a gunfight it would probably never occur to them that they were taking fire from another direction.
My rifle is zeroed for 50 yards, so it would hit just slightly low at the 20 to 30 yards we are seeing here. It’s probably a gimme shot. Bang-Bang, Bang-Bang. If they move to continue the fight after getting shot, I’ve got another 16 rounds in the ready mag and 210 more in 30 round mags.
They are in a poor tactical position in any state but an anti-gun state like Massachusetts.
No word on whether he means to include pressure cookers, and look alike military style crock-pots in his background check bill. It’s a sad country that lets ordinary citizens wander up to any cash register, plunk down cash, and buy any legal product.
Rather than background check everyone, wouldn’t it be easier to just make a list of all the dangerous people and put them in jail or the mental ward? Or is that too easy?
Go read the whole thing. He hits all the high spots. We don’t want to win this quickly with something that looks like a trick. We need to defeat this bill in detail. We need to crush it completely so that it never raises its ugly face again.
No doubt the gun haters will be out in force telling us how we can’t possibly trust a redneck gun toter hillbilly X-tian on campus.
Has it ever occurred to anyone that maybe what they are really saying is that if you’re conservative, self reliant, or you believe in Constitutional Rights, you shouldn’t have access to a college education?
Bob Beckel thinks that rape on campus is rare, and that “date rape” isn’t worth shooting someone over.
I think it was Tam that posted something to the effect of, “aren’t the leftists always going on about how people will only shoot their friends and family, yet they are the same ones saying that women are getting raped mostly by people they know?” I can’t find the post, so if anyone can find it for my, please let me know.
Bob, echoing plenty of anti-gun fanatics, tries to tell us that there is some difference between shooting a “stranger” rapist and shooting a “date” rapist. Can someone please explain to me why shooting someone whose name you happen to know is worse than shooting a total stranger? If he’s trying to rape you, who gives a damn what his name is? Bob apparently subscribes to the Reverse Rumplestiltskin Defense.
You know the story of Rumplestiltskin. The Imp shows up in the tower and promises to spin the straw into gold. The only catch is, that if she can’t guess his name in 3 days, she has to give him her first-born child.
Bob apparently believes the opposite. So long as the rapist is a stranger, it’s ok to use deadly force to stop him. But if the victim happens to know the rapist’s name, Bob thinks she should have to let him rape her.