Donations for the Ammo Budget
Pages
Follow me on Twitter
Shop LuckyGunner and I get a small commission
-
Recent Posts
Google Ads
Recent Comments
- John O'Toole on House Bill 937, Restaurant Carry +P+ passes the NC Senate!
- MJ on Durham man steals cars in scheme that makes no sense
- The Captain's Journal » North Carolina Sheriffs On Purchasing And Carrying Weapons on Fourth Circuit gets it right on Open Carry
- Former NC Republican on House Bill 937, Restaurant Carry +P+ passes the NC Senate!
- Brad on House Bill 937, Restaurant Carry +P+ passes the NC Senate!
Blogroll
- 3 Boxes of BS
- 357 Magnum
- @NC Capital (WRAL)
- A Day In The Life Of An Ambulance Driver
- A trainwreck in Maxwell
- Ace of Spades HQ
- Actively Disengaged » Comic
- Advanced Armament Corp.
- All Nine Yards
- Another Gun Blog
- Arizona Rifleman
- Arma Borealis
- Armed and Dangerous
- Armed and Safe
- Arms are the Mark of a Free Man
- Assorted Meanderings
- Atomic Nerds
- Ballseye’s Boomers
- Bob Owens
- Borepatch
- Bright Lights and Saturday Nights
- Burgers and Boomsticks
- Captain of a Crew of One
- Carteach0
- cocked and loaded
- Concealed Carry on College Campuses
- Crime In Charlotte
- DaddyBear’s Den
- Days of our Trailers
- DOGHOUSE
- Dr. Helen
- eric.r.shelton
- Everyday No Days Off – Gun Blog
- Evyl Robot Soapbox
- Eyes Never Closed
- Fill Yer Hands
- Firearm Blog
- From the Barrel of a Gun
- GayPatriot
- George Zimmerman Legal Case
- Great Satan, Inc.
- Gun Free Zone
- Gunner’s Journal
- GunPundit
- Guns & Coffee
- Guns For Everyone
- Guns, Cars, and Tech
- hellinahandbasket.net
- Hot Air » Top Picks
- In From the Cold
- In Jennifer’s Head
- Instapundit
- Irons in the Fire
- Jigsaw’s Thoughts
- JustOneMinute
- Knitebane Manor
- Last Refuge of a Scoundrel
- LawDog Files
- Lost and Found
- Lurking Rhythmically
- MacBourne’s Musings
- MArooned
- Massad Ayoob
- Michelle Malkin
- Moccasin Creek Minutemen
- My Tumultuous Adventure
- NC SILENCER
- New Jovian Thunderbolt
- Newbie Shooter
- No Lawyers – Only Guns and Money
- Nobody Asked Me…
- Not a Tango, nothing to see here
- Not Clauswitz
- Of Arms and the Law
- Oleg Volk
- pdb
- Pithy Title Goes Here
- Plumbum et Circenses
- Random Acts of Patriotism
- Raymond’s Leather Saps
- Rebel Yell
- Rise of the Anti-Media
- Rob Doar
- Rob Reed Michigan Firearms Examiner
- Roberta X
- Roberts Gun Shop
- SayUncle
- Shall Not Be Questioned
- Sharp as a Marble
- She’s a Garand Gal
- Sipsey Street Irregulars
- Smallest Minority
- SnarkyBytes -
- Standing By
- Straight Forward in a crooked world
- Support Your Local Gunfighter
- The Agitator
- The Armed Lutheran
- The Backwoods Engineer
- The Captain’s Journal
- The Civitas Institute
- The Freeholder
- The Gateway Pundit
- The Lair
- The Miller
- The Minuteman
- the munchkin wrangler.
- The Packetman
- The Squirrel Report
- The War on Guns
- Traction Control
- Tractor Tracks
- Transterrestrial Musings
- Triangle Tactical
- United Conservatives of Virginia
- Valley of the Shadow
- View From North Central Idaho
- View From The Porch
- Vuurwapen Blog
- Waco Blog
- walls of the city
- Warrior Knitter
- We the people…
- Weer’d World
- What Bubba Knows
- What If?
- Wizbang
Categories
- -But-heads
- About me
- Appleseed
- Ashley Smithwick
- Ballistic Complaints
- Blogmeet
- Brian Anse Patrick
- Chris Fitzsimon is scared
- Colin Goddard is wrong
- ConstitutionalCarry
- Cops behaving badly
- CSGV is Kooky
- Don't piss off fat old men
- Dress for success
- Duty to Retreat
- Engineering without a license
- Felons Behaving Badly
- Fineman is a Fool
- For the ladies
- Gnashing and Wailing
- Good Press
- Good Witness
- Gun Death(tm)
- Gun rights philosophy
- Gun Safety
- Guns I Want
- Guns in School
- Gunwalker
- Gunwalker T-Shirts
- Heros
- In the Mail
- International Politics
- Joan Peterson is ignorant
- Junk on a Bunk
- Kids and Guns
- Kriss Vector
- Ladd is a Lunatic
- Laws of NC that need to change
- Liberty Training Rifle
- Linky Love
- Local stories
- LuckyGunner
- Meanwhile in X paradise
- Michelle Dockery
- Mythbusting
- National Politics
- Navel Gazing
- NC Politics
- NCGV is crazy
- New York Boycott
- NGVAC is insane
- No knock raids
- Non-Felons Behaving Badly
- Non-gun politics
- Open Carry
- Open Racism
- People being Jerks
- Play stupid games win stupid prizes
- Posted From My Phone
- Product Testing
- Protests
- ProTip
- Random Stuff
- Range Trips
- Rants
- RIP
- Sean gets Results
- Templar
- TooManyVictims
- Uncategorized
- Unpossible
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
Meta
Site Meter
Category Archives: Joan Peterson is ignorant
Even a blind squirrel sometimes finds a nut
Honest, I don’t read Joan Peterson’s blog. She blocked me during the Great CSGV Reasoned Discourse™ Event of 2011, so even if I wanted to, I can’t follow her on Twitter. Faitmaker, however, caught her admitting the truth on Twitter. She retweeted ShotinOhio who linked to this article
She retweeted this after all the times she stuck her fingers in her ears and ignored me when I told her that people who murder others are rarely new to crime. So here’s some proof for her, but she won’t acknowledge it. We have crooks who murder. Rather than focus on the gun, we need to focus on getting them off the street quicker and for longer times.
The article goes on at length about how terrible it is that carrying a concealed firearm is not a felony.
Since possession of a gun after committing a felony is a federal offense, what are they complaining about? Just indict the criminal federally, and send them to 5 years a long way away in the federal prison system.
But that’s too easy.
Posted in Joan Peterson is ignorant
Roberta was right. I was wrong. Mea Culpa
Roberta warned me. I didn’t listen. Stupid me.
I’m done with japete and Baldr. These two have no intention of changing their anti-gun opinions. They think we are stupid and that they are here to educate us, to bring us into the light. I have deleted them from my RSS feed reader, and I will not be following their comments like I have been previously. I’m done sending them traffic, and it would be nice if everyone else stopped as well. I think it’s time to let them wither away. Japete claims that she writes for an audience larger than us “gun guys.” Well she can see if they can fill up her comments section.
Posted in Joan Peterson is ignorant, Navel Gazing
Now we get to the heart of the problem
Joan Peterson posted on Monday about Martin Luther King Jr. She seems to believe that because Dr. King didn’t shoot his political opponents, that the entire movement was “non-violent.” Several commenters have tried to point out to her the key role of the Deacons for Defense and Justice.
Sevesteen…
After a lengthy discursion where Joan accuses her commenters of supporting the KKK and calling for anti-government violence, she posts this
Why, you might ask, does she cling so bitterly to the idea that the Civil Rights era was entirely without any armed resistance on the part of the blacks? I mean, lets face it, if a few KKK members got shot down in the street, who’d complain? They were a terrorist organization, and when they burned a cross in someone’s yard, it wasn’t to welcome them to the neighborhood with S’mores and toasted marshmallows.
I think that the real difficulty for her is that she is unable to see the difference between ‘violent and predatory’ and ‘violent and protective.’ The fact that some of the blacks in the South armed themselves to protect their families invalidates the whole Civil Rights movement in her eyes. Like many on the Left, she prefers to see blacks as second class citizens “saved” by right thinking Northern whites. Instead of seeing that blacks chose their own paths and fought their own battles, she wants to think of herself as the hero of the story.
So who do you want to believe? A little known liberal white woman from Minnesota? Or Dr. Condoleeza Rice.
Posted in Joan Peterson is ignorant
Joan misses the point again. Probably deliberately
It must be my day to object to Joan Peterson’s foolish ideas. New Trajectory posted something about Michael Moore on the Rachel Maddow show, where they tried to compare US and Canadian “gun violence” rates. Joan Peterson added her two cents
Here is what I have said in response.
“In addition, Moore pointed out that one bullet at Wal-Mart cost 17 cents. What is a life worth, he asked? A 17 cent bullet can end a life in an instant.”
I don’t know which Wal-Mart Mike is shopping in, but I never see ammo there in a reasonable self defense caliber at $0.17 ($8.50 for a box of 50). Why do you insist that self defense should be expensive? Do you really want to price the poor out of that market?
“Maybe we should be taking about the economics of guns and “gun control”.”
This underscores a significant point. People like Joan Peterson wish to restrict firearms ownership to “the good sort.” They wish to prevent the poor (who are largely people of color) from owning the best means of self defense ever devised. She will never admit that her intention is to disarm blacks and Hispanics in the ghettos, but that is exactly what her policies will cause. You see, the concept of an armed lower class terrifies people like her. It is why we call people like that bigots. They think that if they restrict guns to just the “good sort,” then they will have disarmed the criminal element. The fact that they have disarmed the poor, who are the primary target of the criminal class, is just too bad for the poor.
It saddens me that a woman whose sister was murdered by a rich white man is working so very hard to disarm poor blacks and Hispanics.
This is what we are dealing with. This is exactly why we call them bigots. They rage against self defense without ever caring who pays the price. How sad.
Posted in Joan Peterson is ignorant
I guess Joan Peterson was right!
Except that you can’t. The very nice man at this table would take a deposit and hold these guns until you completed the full National Firearms Act process. You should plan on a 3 to 9 month wait before the actual transfer will occur.
I didn’t bother asking him what these cost because whatever it cost, I couldn’t afford them. If you live in NC and want to buy a mini Uzi or a Thompson, email me and I’ll send you his phone number. Check with your banker to see if you have enough money first.
Posted in Joan Peterson is ignorant
The gun grabber squeaks her outrageous outrage again
It’s been at least a few days since I last made fun of our favorite gun grabber. Outdoing herself, she’s posted another pearl clutcher.
Of course there is a reason Traver is being held up. It’s because he’s a gun grabbing, media hogging poster boy for the jack-booted thug branch of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Really Big Fires (BATFEieio)
In the video, Special Agent in Charge, Andrew Traver hands a fully automatic AK-47 to a totally untrained reporter and encourages her to fire it from the hip. This even after they show a “trained ATF expert” shooting the rifle correctly, from the shoulder, in a combat crouch, and in short bursts. By showing this full auto rifle, Traver is perpetuating the lie that full blown machine guns are available over the counter to anyone. Unfortunately for the myth, full auto weapons are subject to strict regulation under the National Firearms Act of 1934.
Umm, no. the guy did not buy a full auto machine gun at an Indiana gun store. (using a false ID) He purchased a semi-auto clone of the AK. The only reason that anyone thinks the criminal and murderer bought a machine gun is because Andy Traver lied to the news crew. Anyone who has so little regard for the truth should not be permitted to be a law enforcement officer at any level, much less the head of a national police organization.
Is gun. Is supposed to be dangerous.
Once again, Japete fails to pay attention
Joan Peterson, who blogs at Common Gunsense, can’t seem to pay attention. In her post, she rails against the NRA for creating the conditions that allowed the Tucson shooter to kill.
Aside from the fact that the only thing that the Assault Weapon” ban did to magazines (NOT CLIPS) was to make it illegal to sell newly manufactured standard capacity mags, this whole line of reasoning is nonsense.
One of the anonymous commenters, probably without much tact put it this way
Her response, proving that she never misses and opportunity to miss the point…
Guy Ohki, probably in hopes of clarifying, said…
Japete’s nonsensical response.
Perhaps if she intends to put herself forward as a leader in the gun banning game she should pay more attention to her own blog.
In the screenshot, I have included Sebastian’s comment in order to give context to Japete’s response about not being so sure about magazine bans being off the table.
Posted in Joan Peterson is ignorant
Japete thinks Airsoft proves her case
Joan Peterson is utterly uninformed. Yeah, I know. Not really a shocker. Here’s her latest attempt to get crosswise with reality.
Later on she asks
So let’s see what the fuss is about
Go ahead and look. I’ll wait. Back already? Did you see what I saw? “No Exports. All NFA Rules Apply”
How about here
you will find this item.
Wow, that looks like a SCARY GRENADE LAUNCHER!!! Except for the fact that it is an Airsoft toy.
And she wonders why we ridicule her for not knowing anything about the things she wants to legislate.
Do you want to know more about how to get a REAL grenade launcher? Take your lottery winnings and go here to read about the process. Some other commenter let her know how foolish she is. I will not comment on her site any more.
The “But it’s a Deadly Weapon!!!111eleventy” exception to the Constitution
Well, japete likes to show her ignorance.
There is a simple reason that background checks are required for sales through an FFL and not when you sell your gun privately. She has a blind spot toward the concept of Federalism. The Federal government only has the powers that have been delegated to it under the Constitution. Under the Gun Control Act of 1968,
The Feds have taken into their regulatory power anyone who fits that definition. That’s why it is called a “Federal Firearms License.” FFL holders have to follow Federal rules because it is a requirement of the license that the Feds mandate that they have. I don’t have a license, I’m not required to have a license, and therefore the Federal government has no power to control my behavior. In a banana republic the government can rule by fiat, but in the US, the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Now japete believes that the Federal Government can simply wave their pens and give themselves powers not delegated in the Constitution. The only reason that the Feds got GCA’68 passed is by pretending that gun sales fell under the definition of “interstate trade,” and was therefore regulated by them. This point is debatable, but for now we are stuck with the idea that if it moves from state to state, the Feds can regulate it. The question is, where does she imagine that the Feds have the power to stick their fat regulatory noses in to a private transaction between me and my neighbor? If I sold my neighbor my lawnmower, can the Feds intervene? No way in hell.
The gun grabbers keep imagining that guns are something different than any other legal product. They want to promote the idea that the Constitution has a “But it’s a Deadly Weapon!!!111eleventy” exception. Instead of arguing the merits (none) and demerits (many) of this foolish idea, maybe we should ask the more important question. Where, exactly, does the Constitution give the Federal Government the power to regulate private sales of firearms?
The gun grabbers keep imagining that guns are something different than any other legal product. They want to promote the idea that the Constitution has a “But it’s a Deadly Weapon!!!111eleventy” exception. Instead of arguing the merits (none) and demerits (many) of this foolish idea, maybe we should ask the more important question. Where, exactly, does the Constitution give the Federal Government the power to regulate private sales of firearms?
Posted in Joan Peterson is ignorant
Murder is rarely the first crime
Our favorite gun grabber japete has spent her later years pushing gun control because her sister was murdered in 1992 by Russell Lund Jr., “The only son of the founder of Lund’s Inc., the Minneapolis food, oil, and real estate empire.” Wanting to know more about this crime, I ran across a book, Greed, Rage, and Love Gone Wrong, Murder in Minnesota, by Bruce Rubenstein. There is even a Google Books review online with most of the pages of the relevant chapter.
I will take japete at her word that she simply wants to spare other people the horror of their family members getting murdered. She’s also maintained that her brother-in-law, the murderer, had “undiagnosed mental illness,” but was “he was not a criminal or had trouble with the police.” This part, however, is not true at all. He was twice arrested for shoplifting, and had been diagnosed as a kleptomaniac. He was also 3rd banana in an “airline” that turned out to be a total fraud.
“It was a paper facade that fabricated phantom revenues to lure real investors.
For a while it was a spectacular success. Shrewd bankers gave the company loans that were never paid, to buy airplanes that were never purchased. Reputable law firms papered transactions that never happened and got stiffed for their fees. Three stock offerings backed by phony revenues yielded more than $30 million.
…
Russell Lund Jr. was one of the few that emerged unscathed. Prosecutors and law enforcement officers agreed that Russ was a pawn and a dupe and such a dunce when it came to business that he couldn’t possible have been culpable.
Nevertheless, for years after the trial Russ figured strongly in rumors that Flight Transportation Corp. flew cash to offshore banks for rich Twin Citians so they could evade taxes.
…
Russ left a packet of information about the Flight Transportation affair with a KSTP-TV reporter shortly before he murdered his wife and her lover. The killings short-circuited any plans the station might have had to follow up. The contents of the packet have never been made public.”
The whole thrust of the chapter devoted to this murderer is that the author believes that Russell Lund Jr’s wealth and personal friendship with the Minnetonka Chief of Police insulated him from the consequences of his actions. It’s hard to say from this distance, using only Rubenstein’s book, if he is correct. The #1 and #2 people in the Flight Transportation fraud received 35 and 25 year sentences for their roles, and the company attorney and 5 employees were either convicted or plead guilty to charges relating to the Flight Transportation scam. Was Russell Lund Jr. involved? We may never know. It’s hard to see how he could be unaware that millions of dollars were being scammed right under his nose, but it is possible. One thing’s for sure. If he was let walk by a friend or someone who was influenced by his wealth, that person must be feeling pretty guilty. Had Lund been jailed, it’s unlikely that he’d have been available to murder his estranged wife.
The most important thing to know about this is, the person who murdered japete’s sister was not the slightly odd, but perfectly law abiding citizen that japete insists he was. This matches what I have maintained all along. Normal people do not suddenly snap and murder people. Even in domestic murder cases, where you’d expect the correlation between prior criminality and murder to be weakest,
It is important to remember this. The gun grabbers want to paint gun owners as one short step from snapping and going on a murderous rampage. If they can convince non-gun owners that the nice guy next door who has a gun might someday kill them, they can get more votes for gun control. What happens when non-gun owners realize that it isn’t their law abiding neighbor with a gun that is the threat, but the known criminal who is the threat? The gun grabbers wish to keep us isolated from our neighbors by fear. They want to engender fear in the minds of our neighbors in order to turn that fear into power, power to take your gun.
I have no idea if japete knows better and is lying, or if she’s convinced that this lie is true. In the end it doesn’t matter much. The important thing is to keep telling the truth. Murder is mostly the province of the criminal class. Past behavior best predicts future results. A tiger does not change its spots. Possession of a gun, nor possession of a license to carry that gun concealed, indicates a possible future murderer. In fact, judging by the extremely low revocation rate of carry licenses, probably the best thing a woman could do to check up on a prospective boyfriend is to ask to see his Concealed Carry license. Let’s face it. Hiring a PI to do a background check is expensive. The Concealed Carry license tells you that the State has already done that check.




