Why, oh why can’t we put anti-gun jurists on the DC Court of Appeals?

It’s horrible, I tell you! Those EBIL NRA people blocked a qualified judge!

Halligan is widely viewed by attorneys on both sides of the aisle as impeccably qualified to sit on the bench. So what’s the problem? It turns out that while working in the New York Attorney General’s office Halligan wrote a brief supporting the efforts of her boss, Andrew Cuomo, “to make gun manufacturers legally responsible for some of the violence in New York, a position that the National Rifle Association opposed. The N.R.A. punished Halligan for doing her job for New York, and the Senate Republicans followed.”

I can’t imagine why the NRA called upon Senators not to confirm an anti-gun lawyer to what amounts to the Junior Supreme Court.

Are Leftists really this transparently stupid? Or are they just lying and hope you aren’t smart enough to know the difference?

2 responses to “Why, oh why can’t we put anti-gun jurists on the DC Court of Appeals?

  1. And just think: That’s the third time she’s been nominated and blocked. That should be a clue.
    Maybe if they keep telling us she’ll do a good job, they’ll start to believe it. Doesn’t mean we will.

  2. HOW ABOUT HOLDING NEW YORKS POLITICIANS LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR GUN VIOLENCE. AFTER ALL THEY ARE RESPONCIBLE FOR CREATING GUN LAWS THAT ARE THE MOST RESTRICTIVE IN THE US….ALL UNDER THE THIER LIES THAT THE LAWS WERE NESSASARY TO END GUN VIOLENCE. THEY FAILED TO PROTECT ANYONE. SO THOSE WHO VOTED FOR GUN LAWS HAVE OBVIOUSLY CHOSE THE WRONG SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM . THEY THINK TO CONTROL LAW BIDING CITIZENS AND FAIL TO SEE THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE GUNS.IT IS THE 90% OF THE CONVICTED FELONS AND OTHERS TO WHOM LAW HAS NO MEANING.