Monthly Archives: May 2013

Take your daughter to work day comes a bit late for one 9 year old

Generally, “Take Our Daughters (and sons) to Work Day” is observed the last Thursday in April. One 9-year-old girl must have been so upset that she missed her chance that she insisted her daddy take her to work last Saturday.

Police arrested a Hickory man for breaking into a residence; they say he brought his 9-year-old daughter along with him.

Aww, how sweet!


Well, it does seem to be his actual employment, so you can’t blame a girl for wanting to see her daddy at work.

Round and round the revolving door of “Justice” goes

He’s headed back in.

Deputies charged a Barnardsville man with possession of a firearm by a felon.

(Suspect) was released from prison in July after serving more than three years.

Get a look at his criminal record.


You pretty much knew that he wasn’t going to stay out long.

His Bloody Valentine

So you think your boyfriend/girlfriend is a bit psycho? How about this guy.

According to police, a man walked into the Rowan County Magistrate’s Office around 6:25 pm Thursday night and told officials he had just stabbed his girlfriend inside an apartment.

But police say before going inside he used the woman’s blood to draw a heart with initials in it on the side of the building.

How does that conversation go, exactly?

  • Crazy Psycho Boyfriend: “Hey cop type people, I’ve just stabbed my girlfriend to death.”
  • Magistrate’s Office Personnel: “OK, anything else you’d like to add to your statement?”
  • Crazy Psycho Boyfriend: “Umm, well there’s the bloody heart I just drew on the outside of this building using her blood. Oh, and I initialed it just so that you know it’s my artwork.”

This will not surprise you.


I can’t make heads or tails of his conviction record. It says up top that he spent 16 years, 1 month, and 15 days in prison, but none of the stuff he got prison for appears to have an “offense date.” You have to wonder what his girlfriend saw in him.

It does seem that he wants to go back to prison. He should get the death penalty, which in this state is he gets put on death row and then dies of old age.

Three charged in murder of new Raleigh resident

She recently moved to Raleigh to take a job as a bank manager. Now she’s dead.

Police say the young mother who had recently moved to Raleigh to take a job as a bank manager was killed in her North Hills apartment last week by three strangers who had intended only to commit a burglary.

They only “intended” to commit a burglary? When you chose an action, you choose the consequences of that action. And the consequences of that action were that a child is without a mother.

Suspect 1

Suspect 3

Looks like they’ve got experience in choosing consequences. Just no real experience in choosing good consequences.

Click over to the article and read the “Criminal Records” section for a flavor of what sort of people we have loose on our streets. It’s sickening. Even the one with no criminal convictions is a piece of work.

(Suspect 2) does not have a criminal history. A 2010 article about long-term school suspensions in Wake County in Durham’s Indy Week reported that (Suspect 2) was suspended for 68 days from Wakefield High School during the 2008-09 school year for sending a threatening email to a fellow student.

All three dropped out of school, so no doubt there will be cries of “the poor ignorant children only stole because they had no skills!” They will never accept that these animals dropped out of school for the same reason they became criminals. Because they have no consciences and no impulse control. Failing to finish school is a symptom of a larger problem, not the cause.

The Camaro Club wants to have a word with this guy

And by the sounds of it, they’d like it to be a private chat, behind the building, holding tire irons.

(Suspect), 42, of Reed Road, stole four wheels and tires valued at $1,120, according to arrest warrants. He also presented a 1994 Chevrolet Camaro that wasn’t his to Johnson Auto Recycling to be crushed for $523, police said.

That better have been a rusted out hulk, because if he crushed something worthwhile, I don’t think any jury in the state would convict angry Camaro fans for beating him down.


He’s got a long and (what’s the opposite of distinguished?) career in crime. Apparently starting his adult criminal career with Murder 2.

Now they are going to “gag hate clerics” in (Formerly Great) Britain

I guess David Cameron is reacting to the embarrassing situation where the British police arrested Facebook and Twitter users for saying nasty things about Muslims. His latest attempt to smooth things over is to crack down on “hate preachers.”

David Cameron is planning new powers to muzzle Islamic hate preachers accused of provoking terrorist outrages such as the killing of soldier Lee Rigby.

The Prime Minister wants to stop extremist clerics using schools, colleges, prisons and mosques to spread their ‘poison’ and is to head a new Tackling Extremism and Radicalisation Task Force (TERFOR) made up of senior Ministers, MI5, police and moderate religious leaders.

The high-powered group will study a number of measures, including banning extremist clerics from being given public platforms to incite students, prisoners and other followers – and forcing mosque leaders to answer for ‘hate preachers’.

All is proceeding according to plan. No one will complain. Those Britons who believe that these Islamist lunatics need cracking down on will cheer. The Islamists will cheer the crackdown on the “racists” who oppose the Islamists. Who will stand up and say that the government is wrong to prosecute free speech from any side?

A far better response on the part of the British government would be to aggressively publicize the words of these hate preachers. They should send the BBC cameras to record the sermons and fund the translators necessary to make these hate filled sermons understandable to the average Briton. This would be what a decent government would do to educate its citizens.

But they aren’t running a decent government. They want to stay in power. And if they tell the truth about the Islamists, or better yet, allow the Islamists to tell the truth about themselves, they run the risk of the average Briton rising up and demanding that the state stop funding these vile creatures. But that would risk taking power from the people who depend on paying these Islamists for votes.

And if the choice is between Power and Truth, can you really expect the government to choose Truth?

HT: The Gateway Pundit

Breaking and Molesting?

How do these two crimes work together?

A city man is behind bars on charges of burglary and child sex abuse.

(Suspect) is accused of breaking into an apartment, which was occupied by a woman and child, near his home late Saturday night, according to warrants.

Proof positive that shooting burglars in the face is too good for them.


Removing this one from society would be a public service.

Why did the British Police arrest Facebook/Twitter users?

What do you have to do in the US to get arrested for something you’ve said on Facebook or Twitter? In the US, you pretty much have to admit to a crime, incite an immediate lawless action (ie, a riot), or make a direct personal threat. I think we can agree that inciting a riot and directly threatening the life or safety of another person is something that the cops should be involved in. But racist statements?

A 22-year-old man has been charged on suspicion of making malicious comments on Facebook following the murder of British soldier Lee Rigby.

Benjamin Flatters, from Lincoln, was arrested last night after complaints were made to Lincolnshire Police about comments made on Facebook, which were allegedly of a racist or anti-religious nature.

He was charged with an offence of malicious communications this afternoon in relation to the comments, a Lincolnshire Police spokesman said.

Presumably the police in (Formerly Great) Britain are intelligent enough that had he said “Let’s go burn down the houses of those Paki scum!” they would have said that he was arrested on suspicion of inciting a riot. Had he said “I’m going to murder the family of that soldier killing, Allah worshiping, camel jockey,” they would have said that he was arrested for making threats. But he was actually arrested for making racist/anti-religious statements. (and yes, I realize that the killers were of African not south Asian descent, but I have no idea what racial epithets the Brits use on black people)

  • Fuck Islam
  • and fuck the Paki scum, too. (apparently “Paki” is as offensive there as “nigger” is in the US)

Both perfectly legal and First Amendment protected statements here in the US. Highly offensive, but protected. But not in England.

That makes us ask, “Why?” It’s not that big a deal to us. We have the KKK and the Westboro Baptist Cult, after all. There are neo-nazis and scum sucking retards of all stripes. (Not that I wish to insult scum-sucking retard-Americans by comparing them to the KKK, WBC, or neo-nazis) And we get along just fine by allowing them to out themselves as the filth that they are by what they say. We consider the First Amendment not only to be a right of all people, but an invitation for assholes of all types to tell us what we should think of them.

Not England. Why not? We didn’t invent the free speech part of the First Amendment all on our own. No, we stole it from them. I’ve said before and I still believe that America is just England, English Common Law, and the Rights of Englishmen turned up to 11. Our big mistake as a colony was to take the ideals of England and act as if the English Government of the time actually believed in those ideals. They didn’t, we did, and so we shot each other until they gave us up as a bad job.

But now, a couple hundred years later, the British ruling class (the political rulers, not the title wearing class) is having the cops arrest people for making “racist or anti-religious” statements on Facebook and Twitter. It’s an “offense against public order.” What an Orwellian phrase that is. Against “public order.” Burning down a building is an offense against public order. Telling someone that they and their entire race and religion are subhuman is more on the order of being a jerk.

While the regular unarmed cops didn’t even try to engage the Woolwich terrorists for 20 minutes until armed police turned up, they had no problem mixing it up with the Englishmen who showed up that night to protest.

Dozens of protesters shouting far-right slogans clashed with police in Woolwich, south London on Wednesday night following the brutal killing of a man in broad daylight.

Click over for video. (Warning: auto play)

So we have two thugs with knives and a pistol and the cops keep their distance, but a few hundred unarmed “Far Right” protesters, and the British police flood the zone. Makes Sense.

It actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it. The British ruling class have been caught trying to replace the population they have with a population that will keep them in permanent power.

There is patchy, though compelling evidence that Labour spoke with a forked tongue, and had a secret agenda. Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Mr Blair, Mr Brown and Jack Straw, has written that Labour threw open Britain’s borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a ‘truly multicultural country’.

Its chief motive may have been electoral. Migrants, and to a slightly lesser extent their descendants, are much more likely to vote Labour than for any other party. So, according to this theory, the Labour Party was furtively trying to increase its powerbase.

The theory is pretty easy to follow:

Generous welfare benefits + open migration = a client class of residents who will vote their economic interests

It’s exactly what the Labour Party did to Scotland, after all. Why would they do any differently in England at the same time?

From this we can easily see why the British ruling class is adamant that the person who needs cracking down on is the “Far-Right” Englishman who objects to his country being turned into a third world hell hole with full welfare benefits. It’s because those “Far-Right” Englishmen are the enemy and the Muslim immigrants who refuse to assimilate, Radical Islamist or otherwise, are their clients. The British ruling class knows who is voting for them and so cracks down on their political enemies while ignoring the crimes of their political allies.

The Left is all about will to power. They want to be in charge and they don’t care who they hurt to stay there. To some extent, the Right is the same way. In some ways, they are worse. They’d rather be the “loyal opposition” to these far Left loons than actually fight. If they fight, they might lose their preferred positions in society. Can’t have that, now can we?

I see jackboots in Europe’s future. The Golden Dawn Party in Greece, the coming racial/religious/cultural warfare in England, and whatever the heck is going on in Stockholm right now are likely to prove Tam correct. We here in the US are parading around with guns and having arguments over what the EUros would consider trivial and essential gun control requirements, but the dark night of fascism will land on the EUros.

I think that’s because our political class knows that we retain the power, and the personal armaments necessary, to send them all straight to hell if they cross us. The EUro politicians have always kept their subjects docile and disarmed, so those subjects have to run riot in the streets and seize state power for themselves before anyone takes them seriously.

It would be nice if the EUros could figure out some better method of settling their social problems than invading their neighbors and putting religious and ethnic minorities to the sword shower.

Death in custody? (*Video*)

The wife is pissed off that her “God-Fearing” husband died while in police custody. She blames the police. Does she blame the person who her husband was fighting with?

Police were called to a neighborhood for an assault between (Victim) and another man and were told one of them had a gun.

Officers separated the two men, and then realized (Victim) was severely hurt and stopped breathing.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department said medic officials, who were already on the scene, took (Victim) to the hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

She says “Everyone has problems and makes mistakes.” 


(RSS Readers click HERE for video)

What did she mean?


Oh, THAT kind of “God-Fearing Man.”

I’m guessing he was on his way to church to sing in the choir when he was set upon by another. And then, to top it off, the evil cops failed to prevent him from dying from injuries due to the fight.

Another person who missed the “you can’t have a gun” memo

The news story comes right out and tells you what happened.

A man previously convicted of involuntary manslaughter was arrested after he discharged a firearm in a friend’s home.

So he’s already caused one person’s death and is still shooting guns at people.


How long till he causes another?